等级表

Vibe Coding 工具梯队表

我们将所有评测过的工具进行分级，并用一句话解释其所处位置的原因。

S

S 等级

  • Cursor logo Cursor The strongest AI editor for real codebases, if you can handle the tooling and watch query limits The highest ceiling in vibe coding, scoped to people who can code. If you can't read the output, the S doesn't apply to you.
  • Replit logo Replit The most complete place to vibe code and actually ship, if you watch the meter S tier as the most complete idea-to-shipped environment in vibe coding. Docked points for effort-based billing that can spike hard during long debugging runs.
  • Softr logo Softr The vibe coding result without the vibe coding cleanup, if your app is a business tool S tier for business apps specifically: portals, internal tools, anything with real users and permissions. Not the pick for custom consumer UI or devs who want code.
A

A 等级

  • Bubble logo Bubble The most capable visual app platform, with real roles and privacy rules, if you can escape the learning curve The most capable visual app platform, with real roles and privacy rules. A rather than S for the steep learning curve and workload-unit bills that spike unpredictably.
  • Claude Code logo Claude Code Top-shelf agentic coding inside your local terminal, if you can navigate the token cost spikes Top-shelf agentic coding for terminal-comfortable builders. A rather than S because token costs are unpredictable and there's no interface for anyone else.
  • Codex logo Codex The raw power of a terminal-based AI coding agent directly in your Git workflow, if you are a code-confident developer A serious terminal coding agent bundled with ChatGPT plans. A tier for code-comfortable builders; there's no visual layer for anyone else.
  • FlutterFlow logo FlutterFlow The most mature route to a real native mobile app, if you are ready for a developer's learning curve The most mature route to a real native mobile app without hand-writing Flutter. A tier scoped to mobile; expect a learning curve worthy of the output.
  • OpenCode logo OpenCode An open-source terminal agent with complete model freedom, if you are happy managing the setup Open-source terminal agent you can point at any model. A tier for the control and price flexibility, scoped to builders happy living in a terminal.
  • Retool logo Retool The fastest way to ship serious internal tools on live data, if your team can handle SQL and JS The grown-up choice for internal dashboards and admin panels on real data. A tier scoped to internal tools; it was never meant for consumer-facing apps.
  • VibeCode logo VibeCode The standout for getting a real native app to iOS and Android from prompts, with transparent raw AI costs The standout for getting a real native app toward the App Store and Google Play from prompts. A tier scoped to mobile; web builds belong elsewhere.
B

B 等级

  • Anything logo Anything A sharp prompt-to-app canvas for quick prototypes, if you can live with platform trust questions A solid prompt-to-app builder (formerly Create.xyz) and Mocha's recommended migration target. B tier: capable, but nothing it does best in class.
  • Base44 logo Base44 The fastest way to prompt a full-stack MVP library, if you can navigate the credit-eating bug loops Genuinely beginner-friendly all-in-one setup. B tier because of recurring stability complaints, credit-eating bug loops, and a backend you can't take with you.
  • Bolt logo Bolt Excellent browser-native IDE for rapid frontend prototyping, if you have your own backend ready Real control over the generated code with clean export. B tier because tokens burn fast in edit loops and the backend, auth, and database are all yours to wire up.
  • Devin logo Devin A capable local coding agent with fast autocomplete, but it struggles to match Cursor's overall pace A capable AI-first IDE, but it sits in a crowded lane where Cursor sets the pace. B tier: good output, fewer reasons to pick it first.
  • Dyad logo Dyad Private, open-source app building running with your own keys on your local machine Local, open-source app building with your own keys - a genuinely different privacy posture. B tier because the polish and ecosystem are still young.
  • Emergent logo Emergent Fastest way to prompt out a full-stack app, if you can keep the agent from burning credits Autonomous full-stack generation that demos impressively. B tier until the maintenance and stability story is proven on builds that live past the demo.
  • Lovable logo Lovable The fastest prompt-to-app experience we've tried, as long as you budget credits for the cleanup Best-in-class for getting a full-stack prototype on screen fast. B tier because of credit-burning debug loops, schema debt, and platform updates that builders report breaking live apps.
  • v0 logo v0 The fastest way to get beautiful React UI from a prompt, if you can handle the backend yourself Unmatched design polish for generated UI. B tier because it's frontend-only and quality degrades in longer chat sessions.
  • WeWeb logo WeWeb Clean visual frontends on a decoupled backend, if you are ready to assemble the stack yourself Clean visual frontends on a decoupled backend like Xano or Supabase. B tier because assembling and owning that stack is real work the marketing undersells.
  • Zite logo Zite Conversational business apps built on Fillout's form-builder DNA, bounded by rigid templates Pitches AI-built business apps and portals, and the demo is slick. B tier until it earns a longer track record - we haven't trusted it with a real client build yet.
C

C 等级

  • Mocha logo Mocha Chat-to-app builder, shutting down August 1, 2026 - migrate now Shutting down on August 1, 2026. C tier on that fact alone: don't start anything new here, and migrate existing builds out now.
  • Same.new logo Same.new Clone a live site's UI into editable React fast, if you stick to simple layouts Does one trick - cloning a site's UI from a URL into editable React - and does it well. C tier as an app builder, because that's not what it is.
  • Softgen logo Softgen Cheap chat-built MVPs fast, but customization gets painful as soon as you leave the template lane A chat-based app generator that works for simple layouts. C tier: thin track record and no standout strength in a field this deep.

接下来去哪

等级是一个定论，而非全部故事。

深入阅读完整评测以了解工具的实际表现，或直接跳转至针对你开发目标的专项排名。

阅读评测

实操记录：前 30 分钟的体验、我们的交付成果以及额度耗尽的时刻。

浏览所有评测

查看排名

基于实际核心需求的用例清单：客户门户、SaaS MVP、个人项目等。

浏览所有排名

梯队表 FAQ

目前最好的 vibe coding 工具有哪些？

没有唯一的赢家，因为最佳工具取决于你在交付什么。按演示之后能否经受住考验来排序，我们目前的 S 级按赛道划分：Cursor 是在真实代码库中进行 AI 辅助编程的首选，Replit 在直接从浏览器构建并上线方面领先，而 Softr 是我们在处理带登录、角色和真实数据的商业应用时会选用的工具。紧随其后的是 Claude Code 和 Codex，它们对以终端为主的开发者来说很强。根据任务匹配工具，并查看适合你具体场景的 排名。

S、A、B、C 等级是如何运作的？

S 是我们在其所在赛道中首选、并愿意让真实用户使用的工具。A 是有一两个需要注意之处的强力选择。B 可以用，但根据你构建的内容，我们会再三考虑。C 是我们用来交付过东西、但大多数情况下不推荐的工具。等级始终针对工具的具体用途而定，所以一个 C 级的原型玩具和一个 S 级的商业应用构建器并不在争夺同一个任务。

为什么最受追捧的工具不总是在 S 级？

因为我们的排名依据是演示之后能否经受住考验，而不是发布视频。很多工具在最初 30 分钟表现出色，第二天却出问题：数据结构开始漂移，代理为了修复自己引入的 bug 消耗大量额度，或者一旦真实用户登录就撞上瓶颈。等级反映的是这个事实，而不是营销效果。

等级列表多久变动一次？

每当一个工具发布了真正推动它前进的更新，或者因某些问题让你付出代价而退步时，我们就会调整它的等级。没有固定的时间表。如果一个工具修复了我们在评测中指出的长期存在的缺点，它可能会上升；如果它变得更不稳定或更贵，就会下降。

对于需要登录的商业应用，我应该信任哪个等级？

要看等级说明，而不仅仅是字母本身。对于客户门户、内部工具，或任何涉及鉴权、角色和真实数据的应用，Softr 位居该赛道之首，因为它的鉴权和数据库是内置的，而不是你需要自己维护的 AI 生成管道。如果你更想在真实代码库中构建，Replit 是偏代码方向的选择。排名 会按使用场景详细拆解这一点。

我在哪里能看到某个等级背后的推理？

每个工具都链接到其完整评测，那里才是等级真正被证实的地方：你能构建什么、用户在说什么、实际使用成本是多少，以及它适合谁。这里的一句话是结论；评测本身才是证据。